Question 1: Identify one example of logical reasoning used by Henry in the passage.

Answer: Henry uses inductive reasoning by linking evidence to a broader conclusion.

Question 2: What does Henry’s reaction to his colleagues’ dismissal reveal about his attitude towards scientific progress?

Answer: It shows he is determined and believes resistance is part of innovation.

Question 3: Which technique is exemplified by Henry’s statement: 'true progress often faced resistance'?

Answer: b) Generalisation

Question 4: Explain how Henry’s internal conflict illustrates the theme of perseverance in scientific endeavour.

Answer: Henry’s doubt and determination highlight the perseverance required to challenge established ideas, emphasizing that innovation often involves overcoming opposition and internal conflict.

Question 5: What is implied by the phrase 'path of innovation was fraught with opposition'?

Answer: It implies that pursuing new ideas involves difficulties and resistance.

Question 6: Identify a possible logical fallacy in the reasoning that if Henry's hypothesis is correct, then science must be revised.

Answer: It could be an example of false dilemma, assuming only two options exist.

Question 7: Describe how the structure of the passage supports its atmospheric tone.

Answer: The passage’s formal and reflective language, combined with descriptions of Henry’s internal conflict and dim setting, creates an atmospheric tone that emphasizes tension and introspection.

Question 8: Propose a follow-up research question Henry might explore based on the passage.

Answer: He might investigate what additional evidence could support his hypothesis.

Question 9: Identify one technique a writer could use to intensify the atmosphere in a similar narrative.

Answer: d) All of the above