Question 1: Identify one strength of the argument presented in the passage.

Answer: The argument recognises both positive and negative aspects of social media.

Question 2: Identify one weakness or limitation in the argument.

Answer: The passage lacks specific evidence to support claims made about misinformation.

Question 3: Which phrase in the passage indicates that the argument is balanced? (Select all that apply.)

Answer: ["b) 'some argue that this has democratized information'","c) 'others contend that it has led to increased misinformation'"]

Question 4: Analyse the persuasive techniques used in the phrase: 'Despite these concerns, the undeniable influence of social media cannot be ignored.'

Answer: It employs emphasising language ('undeniable') to reinforce the importance of social media's influence.

Question 5: Identify and correct any grammatical errors in the following sentence from the passage: 'Proponents claim that social media platforms enable instant access to news and diverse viewpoints, fostering a more informed society.'

Answer: No grammatical errors present.

Question 6: Explain how the argument balances both positive and negative aspects of social media. Use evidence from the passage.

Answer: The argument presents both sides by acknowledging the democratising potential of social media while also highlighting its pitfalls such as misinformation and echo chambers, providing a balanced view.

Question 7: Critique the overall structure of the passage. Does it effectively present a balanced argument? Why or why not?

Answer: Yes, the passage effectively presents both sides of the debate, using contrasting phrases and balanced points to support a nuanced perspective.

Question 8: Based on the passage, suggest one additional argument that could strengthen the discussion about social media's impact.

Answer: Including statistics or case studies to support claims about misinformation and its effects.