Question 1: Identify two strengths of Eleanor's argument as presented in the passage.

Answer: Her passion for innovation and her willingness to challenge norms.

Question 2: What are two weaknesses or criticisms of Eleanor's position?

Answer: Limited sample size and lack of peer review.

Question 3: Analyse the language used by Eleanor to defend her research. What technique is employed here?

Answer: She uses emotive language such as 'revolutionise' and 'progress' to appeal to the reader's sense of innovation and forward thinking.

Question 4: Compare the perspectives of Eleanor and her colleagues. How does their language reflect their attitudes?

Answer: Eleanor's language is passionate and confident, whereas her colleagues' language is cautious and critical, reflecting their reservations about the research.

Question 5: Based on the passage, do you think Eleanor's argument is more convincing than her critics'? Explain why or why not.

Answer: See full answer key

Question 6: Identify the narrative tone of the passage. Is it optimistic, cautious, or neutral? Support your answer with evidence.

Answer: The tone is cautiously optimistic, evidenced by Eleanor's determination to pursue her research despite criticisms.

Question 7: Suggest one alternative approach that Eleanor's colleagues could recommend to strengthen her research.

Answer: Conducting larger, peer-reviewed studies to validate her findings.

Question 8: What is the overall purpose of this passage? Is it to persuade, inform, or explore?

Answer: To explore different perspectives on a scientific debate and evaluate argument strengths and weaknesses.

Question 9: Identify and explain one literary device used in the passage.

Answer: The passage employs imagery when describing the 'dimly lit study,' creating an atmospheric setting that reflects the seriousness of the debate.

Question 10: Write a brief personal response on whether you agree more with Eleanor or her critics, supporting your opinion.

Answer: See full answer key