Question 1: Identify and correct any factual inaccuracies in the statement: "Experts assert that the new archaeological site could rewrite the history of the region."

Answer: Correction may involve verifying the claim; currently, it is presented as an assertion without evidence.

Question 2: Find and correct the biased language or opinion in: "Many residents are excited about the potential for increased tourism."

Answer: The statement reflects opinions or sentiments, which are subjective; factual support may be needed.

Question 3: Identify the rhetorical technique used in Dr Emily Carter's statement: "This could be one of the most significant discoveries of our time."

Answer: This is an example of hyperbole or emphasised opinion.

Question 4: Analyse the use of contrast in the paragraph discussing critics and supporters of the discovery. How does it affect the tone?

Answer: See full answer key

Question 5: Find and correct any inconsistency or factual error related to the environmental concerns expressed by conservationists.

Answer: Clarify the environmental impact; statements about concerns should be supported by evidence.

Question 6: Identify any use of emotive language in the article and explain its effect on the reader.

Answer: Examples include words like 'electrified', 'excited'; they evoke emotional responses and colour the reporting.

Question 7: Evaluate whether the article maintains a neutral tone or shows bias toward a particular viewpoint.

Answer: See full answer key

Question 8: Suggest improvements to make the article more balanced, especially regarding contrasting opinions.

Answer: See full answer key