Historian A: Dr. Emily Carter – Economic Perspective "Dr. Carter argues that Simpson's innovations were primarily driven by economic motives. She suggests that his development of new surgical techniques and improvements in hospital procedures were designed to reduce costs and increase efficiency in medical care. According to her, Simpson's focus on practical and cost-effective solutions reflects the influence of economic pressures in Victorian medicine, rather than purely scientific or humanitarian concerns. She emphasizes that his work contributed to the commercial expansion of hospitals and the medical profession."

Historian B: Professor John Lee – Social Perspective "Professor Lee contends that Simpson's impact was rooted in social reform. He highlights Simpson's dedication to improving patient care and reducing suffering through his innovations. Lee argues that Simpson's work was motivated by a genuine desire to advance medical standards and address social inequalities in health. He points to Simpson's efforts to train surgeons and improve surgical techniques as evidence of his commitment to social progress and public health improvements."