Historian A: John Smith – Economic Perspective

"Historian John Smith argues that militarism was driven primarily by economic interests. He suggests that nations expanded their armies and navies to secure resources and trade routes, which in turn increased national wealth and economic power. Smith emphasizes that military buildup was motivated by economic competition, with countries seeking to protect their economic interests and gain advantages over rivals. He points to the arms race as a reflection of economic ambitions, where military strength became a means to secure economic dominance."

Historian B: Mary Johnson – Social Perspective

"Historian Mary Johnson contends that militarism was rooted in social factors, such as national pride, cultural values, and societal pressures. She argues that societies glorified military strength, fostering a culture that celebrated war and heroism. Johnson highlights the influence of social institutions, including schools and media, in promoting militaristic values. She believes that this social environment created a climate in which countries felt compelled to expand their militaries to uphold national identity and social cohesion."