Historian A: John Smith – Economic Perspective "John Smith argues that the Red Scare was driven primarily by economic fears among American elites. He suggests that the hysteria was used to suppress labor movements and prevent communist influence from threatening capitalist interests. Smith emphasizes that the government and business leaders exploited fears to maintain economic dominance and control over workers. He contends that the Red Scare was less about genuine communist threat and more about protecting economic stability and suppressing dissent."

Historian B: Lisa Johnson – Social Perspective "Lisa Johnson believes the Red Scare was primarily a social phenomenon rooted in fear and suspicion within American society. She argues that widespread paranoia about communist infiltration led to violations of civil liberties, blacklisting, and a culture of suspicion. Johnson highlights how media and government propaganda fueled fears, causing communities to turn against suspected communists. She emphasizes the social impact of the Red Scare, including the suppression of dissent and the erosion of civil rights, viewing it as a manifestation of societal fears rather than solely economic motives."