Source A: Excerpt from a Medieval Chronicle

'Harald Hardrada, the King of Norway, sought to claim the English throne through military invasion, motivated by his desire to expand his kingdom and increase his prestige.'

Provenance: Chronicle written in the 13th century, summarising events of Harald's life.

Source B: The Saga of Harald Hardrada

'Harald believed he had a rightful claim to the English throne because of his kinship with previous rulers and agreements made with English nobles.'

Provenance: Saga written in the 13th century, mixing legend and fact.

Source C: Account of the Battle of Stamford Bridge

'Harald Hardrada and his army landed in England and faced King Harold Godwinson's forces at Stamford Bridge, resulting in a fierce battle.'

Provenance: Contemporary account written shortly after the event.

Source D: Historian's View

'Harald's failed invasion weakened Norway's influence and shifted the power balance in England toward William the Conqueror.'

Provenance: Modern historian's analysis published in a history textbook.

Source E: Letter from a Norwegian Noble

'Harald prepared his fleet and gathered an army, confident of victory because of his previous successes and his claim to the throne.'

Provenance: Letter written by a Norwegian noble in 1066, shortly before the invasion.

Reflective Question:

How did Harald Hardrada's invasion impact the political landscape of England and Norway? Think about both immediate and long-term effects.

Use your knowledge and the sources to support your answer.