Historian A: David Starkey – Political Perspective "David Starkey emphasizes Harold's political skill and strategic abilities. He argues that Harold was a capable leader who faced difficult choices after Edward's death. Starkey portrays Harold as a strong, determined ruler who tried to uphold his claim to the throne amidst external threats. His interpretation suggests Harold's actions were driven by political necessity and a desire to maintain stability in England. Starkey also highlights Harold's efforts to gather support and his military preparations before the Battle of Hastings. Overall, Starkey views Harold as an effective and pragmatic leader, unfairly judged by later historians."

Historian B: Robert Bartlett – Social Perspective "Robert Bartlett views Harold primarily as a product of his social environment and noble obligations. He argues that Harold's actions were shaped by the expectations of the noble class and the importance of kinship ties. Bartlett emphasizes the social and cultural factors influencing Harold's decisions, such as his loyalty to the Witenagemot (royal council) and his kinship with other noble families. He suggests that Harold's defeat was also a consequence of the social and political structures of the time, which limited individual agency. Bartlett presents Harold's story as a reflection of the medieval social order rather than just political ambition."