Analyzing the Articles of Confederation

History
Year 9 / GCSE / Grade 8
6 questions
~12 mins
1 views0 downloads

About This Worksheet

This worksheet explores different interpretations of the effectiveness and significance of the Articles of Confederation in American history. Students will compare contrasting historian views and evaluate their arguments.

Worksheet Preview

Full preview • 6 questions

Analyzing the Articles of Confederation

Subject: HistoryGrade: Year 9 / GCSE / Grade 8
Name:
Date:
TeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizzTeachWhizz

Untitled Worksheet

Grade Year 9 / GCSE / Grade 8
A

Contrasting Historians on the Articles of Confederation

Historian A: Charles Beard – Economic Perspective "Charles Beard argues that the Articles of Confederation failed primarily because they did not support the economic interests of the emerging American elite. He emphasizes that the lack of a strong central government hindered economic development and protected state interests over national unity. Beard believes that the weaknesses of the Articles reflected the economic struggles of the time, which the Constitution later addressed by creating a more centralized economic system. His view highlights the importance of economic factors in shaping political structures."

Historian B: Gordon S. Wood – Social Perspective "Gordon S. Wood contends that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate because they did not foster a sense of national identity or unity among Americans. He emphasizes that the failure to create a cohesive social fabric and shared values led to political instability. Wood advocates that the weaknesses of the Articles were rooted in social divisions and lack of a unifying national ideology, which the Constitution aimed to remedy by fostering a stronger sense of American identity and civic unity."

B

Questions on Historian Interpretations

1.
Summarize each historian's view on the effectiveness of the Articles of Confederation. (4 marks)
[4 marks]
2.
Explain why these two historians differ in their views about the Articles of Confederation. (4 marks)
[4 marks]
3.
Which historian's interpretation do you find more convincing? Explain your choice. (6 marks)
[6 marks]
4.
Outline the main reasons why the Articles of Confederation are considered a failure. (6 marks)
[6 marks]
5.
Compare the economic and social reasons for the failure of the Articles of Confederation as explained by the two historians. (6 marks)
[6 marks]
6.
Evaluate which interpretation you find more convincing and justify your opinion. (8 marks)
[8 marks]

Quick Actions

What is Remix?

Create a new worksheet based on this one. Change the grade level, topic, number of questions, or difficulty - then generate a fresh version.

  • • Change grade level (Grade 6 → Grade 7)
  • • Swap topics (Harry Potter → Macbeth)
  • • Add more questions (10 → 15)
  • • Adjust difficulty

Details

Created
1/1/2026
Updated
1/1/2026
Type
worksheet