Historian A: John Doe – Economic Perspective "Historian John Doe argues that the Greek Olympics were primarily an economic event. He suggests that the Olympics served as a way for city-states to display wealth and power, boosting trade and commerce through the influx of visitors and merchants. The games helped stimulate local economies, encouraging the development of infrastructure and marketplaces. Doe emphasizes that the financial benefits and the prestige gained from hosting the games were key motivations for the city-states to participate in the Olympics, making it an economic driver for Greek city-states."

Historian B: Jane Smith – Social Perspective "Historian Jane Smith contends that the Greek Olympics were mainly a social and religious event. She highlights that the games were held in honor of Zeus and involved sacred rituals, sacrifices, and ceremonies that reinforced communal identity and religious beliefs. Smith argues that the social bonds formed through participation and the shared cultural values were central to the Olympics. She emphasizes that the social cohesion and religious significance were more important than any economic considerations, as the games fostered unity among the Greek city-states and celebrated their collective identity."

Students should compare these perspectives, explaining why the historians have different views and evaluate which argument they find more convincing.