Historian A: Dr. Emily Carter – Economic Perspective

"Dr. Carter argues that treaties primarily served economic interests for colonial powers. She emphasizes that treaties were often used to acquire land and resources, facilitating economic expansion. Her analysis highlights how treaties were tools to establish control over land, enabling resource extraction and settlement, which benefited colonial economies at the expense of Indigenous communities. She also notes that many treaties were unequal, reflecting colonial priorities rather than genuine agreements."

Historian B: Professor Liam Johnson – Social Perspective

"Professor Johnson contends that treaties were fundamentally social contracts aimed at establishing peaceful coexistence. He stresses that treaties recognized Indigenous sovereignty and sought to integrate Indigenous peoples into colonial societies through mutual understanding. Johnson points out that some treaties included provisions for cultural preservation and rights, indicating a recognition of Indigenous identity. He suggests that viewing treaties solely as economic tools overlooks their social and political significance."