Historian A: John Smith – Economic Perspective

"Historian John Smith argues that the attack on Pearl Harbor was primarily driven by Japan's economic needs. Facing resource shortages and economic sanctions imposed by the United States, Japan sought to secure vital oil supplies and expand its empire through military action. Smith emphasizes that Japan's economic pressures directly influenced its decision to attack, viewing Pearl Harbor as a strategic move to sustain its economic growth and avoid collapse. This interpretation highlights the economic motivations behind Japan's aggressive actions in 1941."

Historian B: Emily Johnson – Social Perspective

"Historian Emily Johnson contends that the attack on Pearl Harbor was a result of social and political tensions, including nationalism and militarism within Japan. She argues that cultural pride, wartime propaganda, and a desire to restore Japan’s prestige contributed to the decision to attack. Johnson emphasizes that social factors, such as the influence of military leaders and nationalistic fervor, played a crucial role in shaping Japan’s aggressive foreign policy, viewing Pearl Harbor as a manifestation of Japan’s social and political ambitions during this period."