Historian A: John Smith – Political Perspective

"Historian A argues that the Magna Carta was primarily a political document that limited the power of the king and laid the groundwork for the development of constitutional law. Smith emphasizes that it was a key step in establishing the rule of law in England, influencing future legal and political systems. He highlights that although initially a peace treaty between the king and rebellious barons, it became symbolic of legal rights and limited monarchy over time. Smith sees it as a vital turning point in the development of democracy and legal authority in Britain."

Historian B: Emily Johnson – Social Perspective

"Historian B contends that the Magna Carta's significance lies more in its social impact than legal. She argues it reflected the tensions between the king and the common people, especially the barons and peasants, highlighting social struggles and demands for justice. Johnson believes it showed the growing influence of social groups against royal authority and signaled the beginning of societal change. She emphasizes that the document's symbolic power inspired future social and political movements advocating for rights and justice for ordinary people, not just the aristocracy."