Historian A: Professor John Smith – Economic Perspective

'Professor Smith argues that Church Courts were primarily driven by economic motives. He suggests that they used religious authority to impose fines and confiscate property, which benefited the Church financially. Smith highlights that church officials often exploited their legal power to increase wealth, viewing crime as an opportunity for economic gain rather than purely moral or social correction.'

Historian B: Dr. Emily Johnson – Social Perspective

'Dr. Johnson emphasizes the social functions of Church Courts. She believes they played a crucial role in maintaining social order and moral discipline. According to her, Church Courts aimed to reform offenders and uphold community standards. Johnson argues that their focus was less on financial gain and more on moral correction, helping to control behaviour and reinforce social cohesion.'