Historian A: Dr. Emily Carter – Economic Perspective

"Dr. Carter argues that the belief in the Four Humours was primarily driven by economic interests. She suggests that physicians promoted humoral theory because it supported their authority and economic status. By controlling medical knowledge and treatments based on these theories, they maintained a lucrative profession. This perspective views the humours as a tool for social control, rather than a genuine understanding of health. Her analysis emphasizes how economic motivations influenced medical practices in medieval society."

Historian B: Professor Liam Scott – Social Perspective

"Professor Scott contends that the belief in the Four Humours was rooted in social and cultural factors. He emphasizes that these ideas were widely accepted by all levels of society, reflecting common beliefs about health, morality, and the universe. The humours provided a framework for understanding health that was accessible and familiar to ordinary people. Scott's view highlights how social structures and shared cultural ideas shaped medieval medical practices, rather than economic interests alone."