Interpretations of Appeasement in Modern World History
About This Worksheet
This worksheet explores different interpretations of the policy of appeasement in the lead-up to WWII, encouraging students to compare historian perspectives and evaluate their arguments.
Worksheet Preview
Full preview • 5 questions
Interpretations of Appeasement in Modern World History
Untitled Worksheet
Contrasting Historians on Appeasement
Historian A: A.J.P. Taylor – Economic Perspective
'The policy of appeasement was driven primarily by economic concerns. Britain and France were still recovering from WWI and lacked the resources to confront Germany militarily. Many leaders believed that avoiding war was necessary to prevent economic collapse, and they underestimated Hitler’s ambitions, hoping that concessions would satisfy his demands.'
Historian B: Susan Carr – Political/Diplomatic Perspective
'Appeasement was a failure of diplomacy and a misguided attempt to maintain peace. Leaders underestimated Hitler’s expansionist aims and made concessions that only emboldened him. The policy reflected a lack of will to confront aggression, and it ultimately encouraged Hitler to pursue further expansion, leading to war.'
Questions on Interpretations of Appeasement
Quick Actions
What is Remix?
Create a new worksheet based on this one. Change the grade level, topic, number of questions, or difficulty - then generate a fresh version.
- • Change grade level (Grade 6 → Grade 7)
- • Swap topics (Harry Potter → Macbeth)
- • Add more questions (10 → 15)
- • Adjust difficulty
Details
- Created
- 1/1/2026
- Updated
- 1/1/2026
- Type
- worksheet