Historian A: John Smith – Political Stability Perspective "John Smith argues that the Restoration under Charles II was mainly a political success. He believes Charles managed to restore stability after the chaos of the Civil War and Interregnum, re-establishing the monarchy and Parliament's role. Smith emphasizes Charles's diplomatic skills and the importance of the Clarendon Code in consolidating the Anglican Church, which he sees as vital for national stability and unity. Overall, Smith views Charles's reign as a period of necessary restoration of order and tradition."

Historian B: Emily Carter – Social and Cultural Perspective "Emily Carter contends that the Restoration was primarily a social and cultural revival. She highlights the flourishing of arts, theatres, and scientific learning during Charles II’s reign, which she views as evidence of a vibrant, dynamic society. Carter argues that Charles’s court was a hub of innovation and that his policies encouraged a more tolerant and lively culture. She suggests that these developments had a lasting impact on English society, making the Restoration a period of significant social progress."