Historian A: John Smith – Economic Perspective "John Smith argues that the plague during the Restoration primarily had economic consequences. He suggests that the massive death toll led to a shortage of labor, which increased wages for workers. This shift disrupted traditional feudal economic structures and contributed to social change. Smith emphasizes that the economic upheaval was a key factor in the decline of old societal norms and helped pave the way for modern economic practices. He bases his interpretation on economic records and contemporary accounts highlighting labor shortages and wage increases during this period."

Historian B: Emily Johnson – Social Perspective "Emily Johnson contends that the plague's impact was mainly social. She believes it caused widespread social upheaval, weakened community bonds, and increased fear and superstition. Johnson points to records of social unrest, changes in religious practices, and the breakdown of traditional community support systems. Her view suggests that the social fabric of society was severely affected, leading to long-term changes in social attitudes and structures. She supports her argument with diary entries, church records, and personal narratives from the time."